All work
Supreme ComponentsProduct ManagerAug 2023 to Dec 2023

Fast quotes. Clear commercial boundaries.

Routine RFQs moved slowly, but speed alone could not make automated quotes trustworthy. I shaped a quoting workflow around account context, confidence tiers, price floors, and human override.

Trust mechanism: confidence tiers, price floors, and human override on every quote.

in-stock quotes
18h → <1h
Time to quote
out-of-stock quotes
15d → <3d
Turnaround time
RFQs/month
8K
Quoting workflow
lower logistics costs
22%
Shipment tracking + forecasting
Model confidenceHigh →
High riskCommercial riskLow risk
EscalateLow confidence
High commercial risk
ReviewHigh confidence
High commercial risk
ReviewLow confidence
Low commercial risk
Auto-sendHigh confidence
Low commercial risk
Confidence alone does not grant permission to send a quote. Commercial risk changes the route.

My scope

I owned product decisions across RFQ intake, part extraction, inventory matching, quote routing, and commercial guardrails. I also worked on shipment tracking and demand forecasting, a separate logistics initiative.

The Problem

Response time was a commercial constraint.

RFQs arrived as unstructured requests. Sales teams needed to identify parts, check availability, and apply pricing context before responding. In-stock quotes took 18 hours and out-of-stock requests took 15 days.

What I Found

An RFQ is a moment in a relationship.

A request can be a follow-up, come from a sister entity, or depend on a prior pricing agreement. Treating every message as standalone loses that context. The data model needed to carry the relationship alongside the extracted request.

The decision

Chose
Automate routine quoting with commercial guardrails.
Over
Keep quoting fully manual.
Evidence
In-stock quotes took 18 hours; out-of-stock quotes took 15 days.
Trade-off
Reserve autonomy for requests that satisfy both confidence and commercial controls.
Cost
Model account context and escalation paths before expanding automation.
Account context distinguishes a new request from an existing commercial conversation.
What Shipped

Automation with an explicit boundary.

The workflow connected intake, extraction, inventory matching, and quote-to-order routing. Confidence tiers and price floors defined the boundary of routine automation, with escalation and human override available for commercial judgment.

Account context included prior quotes, sister entities, pricing tier, relationship history, revenue risk, lead time, alternates, and new-product versus repeat-order intent.

System Details

Intake
Intent classification and part number extraction from RFQs.
Matching
Inventory lookup and acceptable alternates.
Context
Prior quotes, account relationships, pricing tiers, and order intent.
Routing
Model confidence and commercial risk determine the review path.
Controls
Price floors, escalation paths, and human override on every quote.
Integration
Quote-to-order workflow.
Outcomes

Faster quotes, with the source of each result clear.

In-stock quoting moved from 18 hours to under 1 hour. Out-of-stock turnaround moved from 15 days to under 3 days across a workflow handling 8K RFQs/month.

Separately, shipment tracking and forecasting reduced logistics costs by 22%. That result belongs to the logistics work, not the RFQ workflow.

What I Learned

Permission matters as much as prediction.

An accurate extraction does not make a quote commercially appropriate. Trust came from carrying account context into the decision and making the limits of automation explicit.

Next case study · Filo

Earning trust in a new tutoring market.

Read case study
Let’s connect

Let’s talk product.

For senior PM and AI product opportunities, or a complex problem worth working on.